Useful dissection of @actionaiduk tax report by @martinhearson and @mforstater. See: http://tinyurl.com/d5anpvg . Too early for either side to win?
-
-
Replying to @chrisjords
@chrisjords@SimonMaxwell001@martinhearson - but it wasn't int tax system that led to no corp tax in this case...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@chrisjords@SimonMaxwell001 I've responded on@martinhearson ' s blog: it's a mix of CIT and WHT loss - both corporate taxes.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bakhunin
@Bakhunin@chrisjords@martinhearson WHT is corporate tax like a cucumber is a piece of fruit.6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@Bakhunin@chrisjords WHT is corporate tax like the Great Wall of China cannot actually be seen from space!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@MForstater@chrisjords WHT paid by companies is corporate tax like PAYE is, er, income tax. Right, time for tea.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bakhunin
@MForstater yes,@Bakhunin is right. WHT is CT incurred in Zambia by the related party, hence creditable against its domestic tax bill.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@Bakhunin Standard Bank/Citibank’s tax bill or Zambia Sugar’s?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@Bakhunin i meant illovo companies in Ireland, Netherlands and Mauritius. But what matters is loss to Zambia, not who gains.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@martinhearson @Bakhunin What matters is what happens in the Zambian economy overall, including the tax take.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.