"Who are you calling cis?" I hear so many nice men & women adopting the language of "cis" as if it is an easy accomadation to inclusion. It isn't. It turns feminism inside out. It makes it impossible to speak about women & denies us freedom of association. To whose benefit?https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1206722121096978433 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
These things are protected w rights. These rights are not about what women wear, whether they identify with feminine ideals or gender norms. They are just determined by sex. There is no right way to live as a woman, in fact that is a sexist idea we are trying to get away from.
So going back to your Q why should a male's lived experience of having a feminine gender identity grant them access to facilities and rights that were set up for members of the opposite sex -- given that this will disadvantage those people that the rights were established for?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I would want to retain data collection & human rights protections based on sex (which includes the right not to be discriminated for being gender non-conforming in appearance). Different beliefs about gender identity can be accommodated, just like different beliefs about gods.
- 14 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.