"Who are you calling cis?" I hear so many nice men & women adopting the language of "cis" as if it is an easy accomadation to inclusion. It isn't. It turns feminism inside out. It makes it impossible to speak about women & denies us freedom of association. To whose benefit?https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1206722121096978433 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What does that mean? Can I assert my atheism without invalidating someone else's lived experience of their god? No. if that means i have to see their experience as true or meaningful to me Yes. if it means i recognise it is 'valid' for them to have their religious experience
The point at which rights come into it is when one person's belief involves seeking to compel others to do (or not do something) i.e. undermining their rights
-
-
I think this conversation gets confused by conflating sex & gender identity. Someone's gender identity may be totally 'valid' (and like religious experience ineffable to anyone else) It doesn't change their sex.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.