Can they not hear how offensive this is? They have a policy commitment that redefines women to include males & when questioned she obfuscates w women are black, white, gay, straight, bi, privileged, poor, disabled .. then says "I am trying to understand what you are getting at"https://twitter.com/zeno001/status/1203995007583244288 …
-
-
For sustainable, legally enforceable protections we need 1. precise definitions & 2. to ensure that definitions are narrow enough so that those identified as within a precise class share common band of needs/experiences of the problem you are seeking to address by legislation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm reminded of a debate on poverty some decades ago. It was claimed there was no "rich" and "poor" because you can't show the boundary. Lord Bauer said equally no such definition of "day"/"night" but was fairly sure everyone agreed they existed. Same for "no such thing as sex"?
-
We do know where the boundary is though. We all do. Every human on earth is either male or female (yes, even "intersex" people). We can tell a person's sex when we interact with them even very superficially. Even if it's a man in a dress and makeup. Even if he's had surgery.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And if she hasn't stopped to do any critical thinking whatsoever, which is damning in itself.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maya, she's taken money from drug companies who make puberty blockers. She's not an idiot, she's something else altogether. I think we are waiting for media to pick the story up but I saw the documentation on here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are taking money for spouting this nonsense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.