That is the paradox of this puroptedly inclusive rhetorical gesture: you end up excluding certain forms of oppression and bigotry from your analysis. And this particular problem is analogous to another incendiary cultural topic.....
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's frequently pointed out by lesbians in relation to the LGBT "community" (mythical thing imo). It recurs in a lot of the things I've written, though not as a major theme - most recently here https://medium.com/@kathleenstock/royal-institute-of-philosophy-annual-debate-talk-on-diversity-d0aa2d8de5e9 ….
I see this w "illicit financial flows" & tax avoidance https://www.ictd.ac/blog/why-illicit-financial-flows-and-multinational-tax-avoidance-are-not-the-same-thing/ … (tldr: they are not the same). (Also weird overlap in people making the move: define big umbrella concept & ostracise people who disagree) https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1128962775500435456 … Is there a name for this move?
-
-
Also: key observation of Crenshaw. Black women's political interests, as distinct group, get lost when grouped with a) black (men); b) (white) women. Part of problem is people's seeming inability to realise single entity can fall under several headings at once.
-
The real meaning of intersectionality! Praise be!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.