A while ago I read through the debates from the time and pretty much all the issues we've been working through are anticipated. They decided none of those concerns, mostly affecting women, mattered then.
Read this whole thread by @HairyLeggdHarpy again. Baroness O'Cathain: "It is only common sense and a basic human right for individuals to be free to believe fact rather than fiction, otherwise we are entering a dark future of coerced, totalitarian-style law making"https://twitter.com/HairyLeggdHarpy/status/1197508374604238848 …
-
-
-
It really is an object lesson in how unless you define the terms of the discussion the nature can radically change. The point at the time was that this affected 5000 people, that being a medical condition of sorts this was unlikely to change.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. It is worth reading the debate during the committee stage to understand the GRA. They knew they were creating a legal fiction but thought the group it applied to was so small it would not matter. Warnings about unintended consequences were not heeded.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.