You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Suppressing freedom of expression in a democracy is a big deal. The judgments in our two cases will have significant ramifications one way or another - which ought to make them interesting whether you agree w the gender critical view or with "Transwomen are women, get over it"
What is notable is many orgs that would normally take an interest in these kinds of Qs are not saying *anything* at all about the fact that these cases are happening @libertyhq @amnestyUK @article19org @fawcettsociety @whywomen @EqualRights @rights_info (even @stonewalluk!)
With the honourable exceptions of @jodieginsberg @IndexCensorship and @FiLiA_charity I have not seen any human rights organisations or leaders commenting (apologies if I have missed any) or acknowledging or explaining the issues in these cases.
Which is weird. Because as the judge in Harry's case said if someone was using derogatory racist terms that would be clear. Everyone would see it. And cases questioning where to draw the freedom of expression line would attract debate and comment.
Summary: legal cases are arguing that fundamental human rights & the ability to speak the truth should be restricted to protect the rights & dignity of people who identify as trans.
And human rights orgs think think it best not to say anything at all about this.
Absolutely!! Women, in the face of the assault on their rights, must take silence as complicity??
Yes. Complicity, fear, pragmatic silence... No org has even put out a basic 'Grainger' explainer related to my case. I guess because even that opens you up to the Q 'what do you think about whether women exist as a sex?', and no one can answer 'I have never thought about it'! 
pic.twitter.com/C40qTVYTco
We’re these cases in the States our major free speech organization, the ACLU, which fought for the right of Nazis to march in a Jewish neighborhood, (which I agreed with-even offensive speech must be protected) would be with the trans. This is how wacky everything has become.
It was interesting that NOBODY in either human rights orgs or mainstream media wanted to talk about the JY case in Canada. You would think that a case about religious freedom v LGBT discrimination would be all over the place but they clearly just wanted to disappear it.
Huge betrayal of women by HR groups on so many levels over such a long period of time.
Shameful
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
