What prompted MF to use belief as the protected issue? Was it the only legal route to sue? As an atheist, I agree that ppl have the right to hold and express religious beliefs but are things like facts about anatomical, sexed bodies as nebulous as a religious belief?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"Belief" in EqA does not preclude being based on fact. The case law (Grainger) is climate change. A man who believed it is both real AND critical we act on it. I believe that sex is real, binary & immutable (because it is!) & important to recognise (for fairness, feminism etc..)
-
-
in breaking news, beliefs can be true! Who knew?
-
I generally preffer to hold true beliefs. The last time I believed I could fly... it didn't work out so well.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Full support to you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.