The way you interact with women in this thread is very strange; even those you appear to know quite well.
-
I don't think the reasons were good enough, given the context and other options available. I still don't. Sorry.
I sense a shift...
from the absolute "no good purpose" to "I don't judge the reasons for taking this particular course of action to be good enough". Which kinda begs the question of what action you are taking to defend women's single sex spaces?
-
-
Lots of things that other people consider to be good things that I do not do all the time. I fail to fund mosquito nets for malaria protection, don't spend very much time volunteering, and don't do all manner of other things. I should spend less time on twitter, I accept.
-
Indeed we all put effort & personal risk into different things at different times. The thing is u assert that the stickerers were wrong to act because there are alternative ways & contexts for arguing that the definition of woman means female, which will not cause offence...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And so far the alternatives you've offered have been we should *not* state clearly the definition of woman. Which seems like a lot of ground to give as a tactic in defending the ability to clearly define a woman-only service (and more broadly the ability to be truthful).
-
I said no such thing. Indeed, if I had, it would have been contradicted by the very first tweet in this thread.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.