But surely in that case the response would be “Which word?” & we’d have to say “Woman meaning adult human female” and there you are. Really do not understand why you appear to find it impossible to understand the difficulty.
-
-
Replying to @artefactoid @AmandaGosling3 and
I am sure the fault must lie with me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SpinningHugo @AmandaGosling3 and
The way you interact with women in this thread is very strange; even those you appear to know quite well.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
-
Replying to @SpinningHugo @artefactoid and
You seem to think if we are reasonable people will not accuse us to be offensive. We are reasonable. Megan Murphy, Canadian feminist, was permanently banned from Twitter for saying 'That's him', referring to transwoman who was still, at the time, also using male name.
1 reply 1 retweet 20 likes -
Replying to @AlessandraAster @SpinningHugo and
So basically you seem to take the very male attitude that if there is a dispute involving women, we must have been the hysterical and unreasonable ones.
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @AlessandraAster @artefactoid and
1. I think that wholly unfair, sorry. The suggestion I have accused anyone of being "hysterical" is untrue. 2. Reasonable people make mistakes all the time. I know I do. I consider you mistaken as to whether this is the morally right thing to do.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpinningHugo @artefactoid and
You seem to insist we should be reasonable. We already are. You did not say we made a mistake, but that we should be reasonable (assumption being we are not). We are the reasonable ones in this debate. Asking to consider biology, need for women to have rights, risks for children
2 replies 0 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @AlessandraAster @SpinningHugo and
What you did say was the stickers were put up for "no good purpose" but only to cause offence. And people have explained to you (1) that the purpose of stating the definition of woman is in order to fight for that clear definition and....
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @AlessandraAster and
(2) that they were a response to stickers whose message is that to recognise biology (as in your first tweet) is "transphobia".
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes
In judging the stickerers to be "behaving very badly for no good purpose, and should stop" did you understand the context, but dismiss the reasons, or not understand the context as well as you do now? (And has any part of that assessment changed with knowing the context?)
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @AlessandraAster and
I don't think the reasons were good enough, given the context and other options available. I still don't. Sorry.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SpinningHugo @AlessandraAster and
I sense a shift...
from the absolute "no good purpose" to "I don't judge the reasons for taking this particular course of action to be good enough". Which kinda begs the question of what action you are taking to defend women's single sex spaces?2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.