Hugo also misses the point that many women find the 'Trans women are women, get over it' stickers offensive, and done for no good reason.
-
Given (a) the obvious offence that would be caused (and if you think there is none, see my replies) and (b) that a gender critical position could have been expressed in a way so as not to give offence I think it was the wrong thing to do
There are a significant number of influential & loud people who say that there is *no* way to state the gender critical position in a way that does not give offence. i.e. if you don't believe that transwomen are women that is transphobic and if you say so you will fall foul of a)
-
-
Its not about whether the message is put on stickers or an academic paper, or a newspaper article or an utterly reasonable talk https://womansplaceuk.org/2019/09/26/i-am-not-your-enemy-lets-talk/ … someone will take offence, and someone else will say that women caused that offence by not being nice enough
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tbh I do not think he is aware of quite of toxic debate is for women. Although fact that definition of woman is now a form of hate speech should be a major clue
-
But he doesn't bother to find out. It's the usual "we have bigger problems than women's concerns."
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.