if we think, as some moralists do, that law should in some way track morality, and seek to make us conform to our good reasons for action, then again we might want to criminalise this. The words are calculated to offend a group that understands them, for no good purpose. /6
-
-
Deliberately offending people for no good reason is morally wrong I think. The problem with the stickers was that they didn't carry any of the reasons why someone might object to self-identification.
-
But the moral question is harder than both the positive law question, and the justice question of the proper scope of the criminal law. Which are and were my concerns.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There are three slightly different things : meaning to offend, offensive and offending. I guess the stickers (and in a meta way
@SpinningHugo s posts) are the last -
Hugo also misses the point that many women find the 'Trans women are women, get over it' stickers offensive, and done for no good reason.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
He is conflating statements of fact and statements of belief. I think we move into really dangerous territory when we take offence at facts. And this is where we are with trans rights.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.