@OwenJones84 just loves to intone endlessly about being on "the right side of history" but it took just 3 months for NSPCC to confirm that on this issue he wasn't just on the wrong side of history but also ethics, employment law & childrens' safeguarding.
-
-
Replying to @TwisterFilm @MsHelenWatts and
Concerning that it took them that long really.
2 replies 0 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @chloeklassen @TwisterFilm and
Well, they would have had to investigate before sacking him and that takes time. I expect he was suspended during any investigation. Due process must always be followed.
3 replies 1 retweet 48 likes -
Replying to @MsHelenWatts @TwisterFilm and
Chloe Klassen Retweeted NSPCC
Yes of course, but I was really referring to this tweet, which they didn’t seem to need to follow due process before publishing...https://twitter.com/nspcc/status/1138858597390147586?s=21 …
Chloe Klassen added,
1 reply 1 retweet 37 likes -
Replying to @chloeklassen @MsHelenWatts and
It shouldn’t take 3 months to come to the conclusion that raising concerns about child safeguarding is not on the wrong side of child safeguarding, but if your “priority” is not child safeguardoing, but instead to support staff, then perhaps it does.
1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @chloeklassen @MsHelenWatts and
It didn't, he appealed the decision hence the time. According to the Mirror article.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Ceeekerrr @MsHelenWatts and
Ok yes. That’s really what you would hope for, and if they had made that decision clear at the time that would maybe have helped people like OJ who interpreted child safeguarding concerns as homophobia.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @chloeklassen @Ceeekerrr and
The only sensible thing the NSPCC could have have done is to immediately suspend and say nothing until the dismissal and appeal process is finished. That they didn’t and appeared to conflate genuine concerns with homophobic bullying is worrying.
2 replies 3 retweets 50 likes -
Replying to @MsHelenWatts @chloeklassen and
The social media team of the NSPCC behaved in an extremely hostile and counter productive manner. On one hand they urge people with concerns to contact them yet call them bigots when they do.
2 replies 7 retweets 50 likes -
Replying to @Ceeekerrr @MsHelenWatts and
Very good point about public confidence to report concerns.
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes
Yes it's fair enough it took them this long to go through due process but now they could reflect on their own conduct @PeterWanless 's letter and their social media response. Time for another letter: lessons learned
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @chloeklassen and
NSPCC should be modelling what an org that takes safeguarding seriously should do when people raise concerns, and find it's core : it's number one priority must be children, not staff, not celebrities, not reputation
1 reply 2 retweets 21 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @chloeklassen and
Yes he was suspended. Interviewed. Sacked. He appealed. They upheld his sacking. All takes time. But at same time demonising those who reported it. Poor management of situation.
0 replies 0 retweets 8 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.