Since you say this group does not have a name, I am trying to be clear about the group we are talking about and defining that as X ok?
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @AidanCTweets
The group is people with female anatomy. i.e. female people. And this in your terms includes all cis women, all trans men and some non binary people. Are you ok with that category as 'X' for our purposes?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AidanCTweets
No the category I am trying to be clear about is people with female anatomy - so (in your terms) 'cis-women, trans men and some non binary people people'
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AidanCTweets
OK fine. "People with female anatomy". Would you also be fine with "female people" or simply "female"?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AidanCTweets
Female is clearer. It is one word. A lower reading age. It seems *less* confusing..... I mean people with female anatomy are female. People with male anatomy are male.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @AidanCTweets
Anyway so "people w female anatomy", as you call them, do you think they have any common needs Should data be collected on them, Should they be protected against discrimination? Should they have freedom of association as a group? Should services be provided for them seperately?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Why only services directly to do with female anatomy? Do you think female people face discrimination or have needs, seperate from men, that are not directly linked to their genitals? Eg What about girls schools, womens refuges, programmes for women in STEM etc?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.