Boris Johnson will cut aid spending fot the world's poorest by £1bn, and give the money to "UK inventors" to research climate change.https://twitter.com/john_rendel/status/1175900376291299330 …
-
Show this thread
-
It is wrong make the world's poorest pay for climate change anyway. But this is clearly a bung to UK companies or universities, a genuine attempt to tackle climate change wouldn't tie aid to "UK inventors".
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @owenbarder @AW_Baker
Jesus. Raiding the aid budget for a collection of pet projects spent in the U.K.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Fihi_maFihi @AW_Baker
I'm not wholly dismissive of the possibility that spending money on global public goods (such as knowledge needed to avert a climate catastrophe) might be a good use of aid money with higher returns for the world's poor than some of the other things we do with aid money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @owenbarder @Fihi_maFihi
I entirely agree! But I don't think it is likely to be a better use of aid money than the most effective programmes (do you?). I think we should count $ on climate mitigation against emissions targets, not aid. It makes more sense, and would better align incentives.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The big "new & additional" question! http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/faqs/what-is-climate-finance-and-where-will-it-come-from/ … I wouldn't count Brazil REDD $5/tonne as a real benchmark. Most of Brazil's historic emission reductions linked to avoided deforestation are unsold so the 'price per tonne' is entirely symbolic https://oxfordclimatepolicy.org/sites/default/files/Amazon_Fund_working_paper.pdf …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.