Beware biological essentialism: the latest frontier in civil rights, and the unholy alliance between gender-critical feminists and the far right:https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/9/5/20840101/terfs-radical-feminists-gender-critical …
-
That's what I meant. Someone being allegedly better at gymnastics because of their trans status is not an argument for their exclusion from legal protections against sexual assault
Sexual assault is a crime. Not sure what that has got to do single and separate sex services, which is the issue in question in relation why Alice thinks sports is a 'special case' whereas other situations of female only services should be overridden by identity?
-
-
The purpose of sex segregation in society is to reduce sexism and sexual violence. I'm sure some people see it as maintaining tradition too but that's bs. The purpose of it in sport is not for those reasons. Therefore using the same justifications for both doesn't make sense
-
No that is not the purpose. The legitimate reasons for providing single and separate sex services are set out in the Equality Act (Schedule 3, S. 26 & 27). Its nothing to do with 'reducing sexism'.pic.twitter.com/At6Hj2WeBo
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.