But someone can be XY and develop as a female. So it is complicated. There are layers of biochemical interpretation between DNA and all aspects of phenotype, so there’s likely to be so much variation even within what we consider ‘normal’.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I am trying to engage with people interested in debate here. But less interested in responding to ad hominem responses, which seem to predominate. This is an issue where biology, human rights, politics collide - and we do need to debate it.
You have accused gender critical feminist of being in "an unholy alliance with the far right". Do you see how that could be seen as an ad hominem attack, rather than engagement?
-
-
Interesting that someone who believes ”transwomen are women” describes women who don’t think the same as “unholy”
-
Humanist president *sigh*
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If the truth hurts, the good news in this case is that you can change it. No one's obligating bigots to continue to preach bigotry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.