The more we package up interventions separately, the more we remove choice (and by extension people’s sense of being trusted and respected) and tie people up in compartmentalised paperwork, and trips here and there to obtain benefits. But it’s great for headline grabbing.https://twitter.com/lnmackenzie1/status/1171374174318862337 …
-
-
Free dispensers would be a minor victory for normalising women’s bodily functions, and avoiding having to crisis react. But fundamentally agree waving around free sanitary products is being used as a distraction from wider poverty debate.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unless free supplies are reliably available at the time when you are caught short they don't solve that problem, But making them free makes it less likely to be reliable. I guess there is a need for some sort of digital pay dispensers now we don't carry cash. I haven't seen them?
-
They always used to be painfully expensive as well - complete con (I’m generally past point of being caught out, so not best placed to observe if that’s still true or what’s now standard).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.