I'm very confused. The article has a footnote that the program Pew used "has no innate understanding of the concept of gender or gender identity" and yet the article refers to gender throughout. @MForstater, what am I missing? https://twitter.com/FactTank/status/1169614617603166217 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
This is the clear example of the confusion between sex and gender. It's painful to see it in action of all places, in Pew!
@pewresearch If it's binary, it's not gender, it's sex. It your footnote says computer doesn't understand gender, then don't use it in the article. Sigh...2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @marjeaksli @pewresearch
@stefanjwojcik@remy_eem could you just say "SEX", we are all grown ups, we won't be offended!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @MForstater @marjeaksli and
Q: Did they people who's photos the programme was trained on have an innate understanding of the concept of "gender identity" (I know I don't). More likely they were just classified by sex
7:56 AM - 5 Sep 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
