-
These two are actually well qualified for rightsinfo which often seems to rely heavily on law students and 'future trainee solicitors'. One is a family lawyer not sure about the other.
Well qualified, but quite partial, from a firm which campaigns with Mermaids, Stonewall and sponsors TELI conference.
-
-
So Rights Info publish pieces without balance and with clear bias against a group with a protected characteristic (or 2 - sex & maternity). How is this ok for a Charity? Is the Commission aware? They might also be interested in the dismissive ‘complaints system’
-
Come to think of it, have Rights Info EVER published a piece in support of the human rights of females? Or have the lads at the top decided they’re not worth it? Are they, in effect, lobbying to remove our sex based protections?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agree. It's not much more than an advertorial.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.