-
-
They barely considered the impact of self ID on another single sex services, or the replacement of sex by "gender identity" and concluded "we can relax" ....really pitiful article, no analysis, did not unpack any issues.pic.twitter.com/Wm07KNnYmN
-
As
@Alex_FeisBryce said " We decided to give a platform to the people who matter on this issue: trans people & their families, & experts who can challenge the myths" https://rightsinfo.org/2018-human-rights-round-up/ … so, no, I don't think they commissioned them to take womens rights concerns seriously
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Certainly they haven’t thought about indirect sex discrimination let alone that single sex exemptions are often by necessity circumstantial rather than literally case by case. Suggests not discrimination lawyers
-
These two are actually well qualified for rightsinfo which often seems to rely heavily on law students and 'future trainee solicitors'. One is a family lawyer not sure about the other.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
