Or perhaps several such brands. Who knows?https://twitter.com/AdamWagner1/status/1161950927105875968 …
-
-
Replying to @IanCobain
I can confirm that
@rights_info is not in any way supported by the government!!!2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Can you also confirm that
@rights_info understand that sex is a protected characteristic & recognise women’s sex based rights in law?@MForstater1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You know perfectly well that they know what the list of protected characteristics says. Sarcastic cross-examination really isn’t a good tactic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielquotes @JoDrant and
Except that their actions makes one doubt that they would ever advocate for sex based rights.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JohnsonFido @JoDrant and
So then the question should have been, “Do you ever advocate for sex-based rights?”
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gabrielquotes @JoDrant and
I agree that would have been a better question. But fear the debate is academic as I doubt they'll want to engage in debate on the topic for fear of attracting the Transphobefinder General to their door.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JohnsonFido @JoDrant and
The question Jo asked didn’t invite them to engage in debate. It was a hostile, closed ‘yes/ no’ question that was designed to annoy rather than open a dialogue.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Hello @gabrielquotes welcome back to my mentions. Last time you were asking for info about falsehoods in @rights_info 's reporting which you said you were interested in, but then you weren't. Open dialogue much?pic.twitter.com/yKGxJloJQx
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
He appears more interested in telling women what their motivations are because he knows their minds better than they do.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.