You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
My briefing argues (1) this must cover the full scope of the single sex exemptions - this is not just about refuges and rape crisis centres (2) It must follow the protected characteristic of sex in @2010Equality
(3) It should reject the idea of case-by-case assessments of individuals who are of the opposite sex (4) It should reject the criteria of "passing" introduced in previous guidance which is inhumane and potentially humiliating for all
(5) It should make clear that trans inclusion in public life does not require undermining the integrity, clarity and security of single sex services
It should reject the idea that it is ‘transphobic’ to recognise the protected characteristic of sex, and include ‘gender critical’ women and women’s organisations in the development of the new guidance.
The @EHRC already changed its advice last year. In developing new statutory guidance it must follow the Equality Act and not it's previous guidance.pic.twitter.com/43o82gMnN9
I might of misunderstood, but I had thought the ‘case by case’ was intended to be ‘service by service’ not ‘person by person’ and was misinterpreted. Did I get that wrong? (Don’t think service by service works either, but interested in the intent of the previous guidance)
The old guidance suggests it is on an individual basis. But this doesn't make sense & is completely unworkable in most situations. I agree with you, I think the correct reading of EqA is service-by-service (or for charities can be the whole org if single sex is in their objects)pic.twitter.com/Q7QJeWbkvC
It seems important to ask transsexual /transgender people about this, too.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
