Why is @AdamWagner1 so wise on most things but unable to see the issue here?
-
-
Replying to @AmandaGosling3 @thelawyercatrin and
Perhaps you just agree on most issues and disagree on this one? It doesn’t necessarily mean you’re wise and he isn’t...
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gabrielquotes @AmandaGosling3 and
Eminently possible but to not even acknowledge (despite being repeated told & balancing conflicts of rights is accepted law) that a legitimate counter position from many mainstream women exists is problematic. To then even omit sex as a p.c. evidences sex discrimination
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @AudreySuffolk @gabrielquotes and
By
@rightsinfo that is. No idea what@AdamWagner1 pesonal position is1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AudreySuffolk @gabrielquotes and
Adam Wagner Retweeted Adam Wagner
I have written pretty extensively here on trans rights and engaged with people on the issue, e.g. https://twitter.com/AdamWagner1/status/1052510814383497216?s=20 …https://twitter.com/AdamWagner1/status/1131851534097100801?s=20 …
Adam Wagner added,
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdamWagner1 @gabrielquotes and
I don't write for
@rights_info and try to keep a clear separation as Chair of the charity and my own personal views, to ensure that nobody can accuse RI of being a mouthpiece for me, as is the Charity Commission guidance.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AdamWagner1 @gabrielquotes and
But of course I keep an eye on content and complaints which come in re the charity, and try to ensure as a small charity we keep to our legal+governance obligations. The team work hard to achieve balance and present a human rights perspective, as is the point of
@rights_info3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdamWagner1 @gabrielquotes and
I'd like an answer as to what Rights Info's approach is (and this cannot be answered by the complaints process which is about the accuracy of specific articles -- this is a question about the charity's policy)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @AdamWagner1 and
Is rights infos policy (A) to include and take seriously analysis of the issue which recognises that gender critical viewpoints are legitimate (i.e. that some people continue to see sex, and not only 'gender identity' as important in protecting human rights)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @AdamWagner1 and
Or is it (B) to exclude these viewpoints because they are bigoted and transphobic and therefore (like racism, facism, anti-semitism) there is no legitimate place for people who hold them to contribute to the balanced fact based discussion that rights info seeks to host
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I'm guessing by the fact that I never get a response that I'm probably muted.
I annoy myself sometimes....But still the Chair of a human rights org ought to be willing to answer the Q. Why does your org ignore GC views in its coverage on gender ID? On purpose or by accident?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.