I may just not have seen any response from @rights_info on this topic, but I have certainly seen it being raised on more than one occasion. Thoughts, @AdamWagner1?
-
But of course I keep an eye on content and complaints which come in re the charity, and try to ensure as a small charity we keep to our legal+governance obligations. The team work hard to achieve balance and present a human rights perspective, as is the point of
@rights_info
I'd like an answer as to what Rights Info's approach is (and this cannot be answered by the complaints process which is about the accuracy of specific articles -- this is a question about the charity's policy)
-
-
Is rights infos policy (A) to include and take seriously analysis of the issue which recognises that gender critical viewpoints are legitimate (i.e. that some people continue to see sex, and not only 'gender identity' as important in protecting human rights)
-
Or is it (B) to exclude these viewpoints because they are bigoted and transphobic and therefore (like racism, facism, anti-semitism) there is no legitimate place for people who hold them to contribute to the balanced fact based discussion that rights info seeks to host
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.