We know customs fraud is a problem. And we know that if you crunch the gaps and mismatches in Comtrade data you can reliably produce big numbers. What we don't know is whether these numbers say anything meaningful about the reality of the problem
-
-
Why are GFI, the funder of this report
@FordFoundation , the members of the transparency and accountability community@TAInitiative@FinTrCo all so willing to keep churning out these reports, and so uninterested in scrutinising and seriously considering their findings?Show this thread -
If you believe the misinvoicing methodology works to uncover real large scale fraud you should be chasing down the story of the Ireland-Egypt essential oil trade, not bundling it into a spurious headline about billions for the SDGs.pic.twitter.com/jDInBFB1iA
Show this thread -
.... Unless the whole point of the methodology is to come up with big numbers. ..... because they can be used to argue for policies on transparency and accountability....
Show this thread -
I like transparency and accountability. Its a good hypothesis and hope. The idea that if people have access to data about what their govt & other powerful organisations are doing they will hold them accountable. But it is a dynamic that has to be built by people & organisations
Show this thread -
How can foundations contribute to that that if they are satisfied to keep funding the same organisations to produce the same reports, with the same lack of curiosity and scrutiny. ....."We need more transparency!" But don't look too closely at the analysis!
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
