This a good question that someone will write their PhD on one day, when collective sense that words don't erase sex, has been regained. The answers are interesting <waves to future PhD student who finds this thread>https://twitter.com/TheJWQ/status/1155152322433093632 …
-
-
Women's political history - channeling Suffragettes & Suffragists?
-
Channelling or finding the same evolutionary niches in the political landscape again
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some of it is just contingent on amazing people just getting it together and then building for critical mass, a breakthrough moment. Could happen in Canada, with the Yaniv case (though their laws are so much worse than ours)?
-
For instance, I know many women in Scotland were despondent for a long time - their consultation process earlier with women less prepared. But work building a critical mass and crucially connecting with brave politicians ready to take a stand was transformative.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think Mumsnet has played a role. The majority of its users are UK based and they were one of the few sites to allow (albeit with restrictions) discussion and criticism of trans ideology. It was also a place where many of us networked and formed local campaign groups.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 5 more replies
-
-
-
Could it be Brits tend to be bolshier and have good bullshit detectors? Less compliant? More sceptical, bloody minded and tendency to embrace non-conformity?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
More awareness of class and less of an emphasis on individualism?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
