Guardian very belatedly reporting the Yaniv case. Seems they realise their anti-women/pro-trans activist bias is starting to be too obvious. Going to take a lot more than this to win back women readers. look.https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jul/27/male-genitalia-week-in-patriarchy-women …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @hogotheforsaken
Belatedly and very poorly reporting - this analysis takes up and uses JY’s own too-readily-resorted-to language of “hate crime”, instead of more accurately describing the dispute as one of conflicting rights
3 replies 7 retweets 77 likes -
Replying to @BarbaraRich_law @hogotheforsaken
@arwaM has lost the language to talk about this sensibly "What if the person who wants their intimate areas to be waxed is a woman with male genitalia?"
4 replies 2 retweets 70 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @BarbaraRich_law and
Exactly. No language to discuss women's sex based rights No language to recognise the importance of safeguards No language which enables male pattern behaviours & VAW to be identified.
@Guardian has played a significant role in the policies which have put women & girls at risk2 replies 7 retweets 22 likes
Trying to ringfence the issue as "women should not be forced to handle male genitals" ... but they are bigots if they object to finding themselves naked, vulnerable, in bodily contact with a male body in any other 'women only'' situation. Shrinking the boundaries of consent
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.