You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Belatedly and very poorly reporting - this analysis takes up and uses JY’s own too-readily-resorted-to language of “hate crime”, instead of more accurately describing the dispute as one of conflicting rights
@arwaM has lost the language to talk about this sensibly "What if the person who wants their intimate areas to be waxed is a woman with male genitalia?" 
Exactly.
No language to discuss women's sex based rights
No language to recognise the importance of safeguards
No language which enables male pattern behaviours & VAW to be identified.
@Guardian has played a significant role in the policies which have put women & girls at risk
Trying to ringfence the issue as "women should not be forced to handle male genitals" ... but they are bigots if they object to finding themselves naked, vulnerable, in bodily contact with a male body in any other 'women only'' situation. Shrinking the boundaries of consent
And fails to notice one of the services Yaniv requested was arm waxing. Suggests Yaniv absolutely right to take action against that women -- who works alone from home offering a personal service to women and doesn't feel comfortable in the same situation with someone who is male
“Lost the language” is exactly right. Her words have gone through the mangle machine.
That’s “a man” then.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
