The case is not about “denouncing” anyone. It is about recognising that bad laws set bad precedents. In this case the Canadian law enables someone to be a woman and then demand the cover of human rights law to force a born woman into unwanted physical contact with their balls.https://twitter.com/kat_blaque/status/1154180571959975936 …
And its also about recognising the humanity & rights of the 'waxing ladies'. JY denounces them as transphobes. But few agree. If these women are not 'phobic' for wanting consent about being in close contact with males, perhaps other women's boundaries are worth respecting too.
-
-
I think that is real reason many in media or political office isn’t talking about this? Boundaries. Who’s boundaries will be protected. And if touching becomes a boundary, why isn’t personal space protected too. This is the perfect double edge sword to break the movement.
-
Not so much personal space as single sex spaces. If its not transphobic for these women to be alarmed by an unexpected naked male in their house, why is it transphobic not to want an unexpected male in the showers, changing rooms, dormitory or any place that is for females?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.