So you won't be supporting the legal case that argues 'gender critical' views should be protected in law?
Brill. I look forward to reading your piece explaining why @MForstater is wrong to be doing just that.
(Unless, of course, it's only trans women's views you disagree w).
-
-
Replying to @beccalamjig @Docstockk
People ARE protected in law against discrimination or harrassment on the basis of belief or lack of belief. If GC belief qualifies, then so does disbelief in the the GC world view. People should not be discriminated for their beliefs but they can't compel others to share them
6 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Your response bares no relevance to what was said by Becca. Stock argued that legislation shouldn't protect "feelings" ... well then in that case legislation shouldn't protect your feelings either!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The Equality Act exists to protect people against discrimination. You know.... people should be treated deritimentally because of their sex, race, religion, disability, or because they are trans? That. It's about people being treated fairly.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
("shouldn't be...")
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.