@rights_info calls it "Progress Undone", "regression" .....
Show this thread
-
“How do you assess the strength and function of some one’s genitalia? Where is the legality in that?” she asks..... it does sound a bit odd
Show this thread
Except it doesn't say that.... READ THE POLICY. What it says is "consideration of physical strength and genitalia" . Which seem like perfectly reasonable things to consider if you are thinking about locking a male criminal up in a women's prisonpic.twitter.com/N3gL3YCEyQ
-
-
What prompted the review says Brewer was the government capitulating to "anti-trans campaigners" who put forward “the idea that trans women impose an inherent risk to non-trans women”
Show this thread -
"It attaches that risk to their trans identity.” I can not get over the stupidity of this. Men pose an inherent risk to women, whether they have a trans identity or not. If you cannot understand this you have no place writing about any of this.
Show this thread -
“We need to look at this from a human rights perspective" says Brewer. .....Except both she and every body at
@rights_info appears to have forgotten that women in prison have human rights.Show this thread -
I am going to tag in
@AdamWagner1 but I don't expect a response, apart from the usual 'put in a complaint', which will be fobbed off by the team. Adam your organisation has a problem on this issue. It is the board's responsibility.Show this thread -
Michelle Brewer is co-founder of
@UKTELI and co convenor on prisons (along with, at one time Jess Bradley ). You'd think@rights_info would mention their expert is not just "a barrister" but co-founder of a lobbying organisationhttps://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025286778025136128.html …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.