So you won't be supporting the legal case that argues 'gender critical' views should be protected in law?
Brill. I look forward to reading your piece explaining why @MForstater is wrong to be doing just that.
(Unless, of course, it's only trans women's views you disagree w).
-
-
Replying to @beccalamjig @mimmymum and
Shhh... it’s one rule for trans folks and another for cis women.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MrLexJay @beccalamjig and
Nope. Same human rights for everyone.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @beccalamjig and
I refer you to Becca’s question then
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @MrLexJay @beccalamjig and
Maya Forstater Retweeted Maya Forstater
Which I responded tohttps://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1154096190994223104?s=19 …
Maya Forstater added,
Maya Forstater @MForstater
Replying to @beccalamjig @Docstockk
People ARE protected in law against discrimination or harrassment on the basis of belief or lack of belief. If GC belief qualifies, then so does disbelief in the the GC world view. People should not be discriminated for their beliefs but they can't compel others to share them
11:56 AM - 24 Jul 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.