It's great that you think you've "got one over on the transes", but the majority of the community is pretty horrified at her behaviour. That's not because she is trans, it's because she is a nonce and an entitled perv. Trust me, we find her case disgusting. Should all...
-
...as intended does not require others policing them. Whether trans, cis, intersex, non-binary etc, if someone is not acting dodgy, leave them be. It is really not that hard. This goes for all "single sex" spaces that the public have access to.
The issue is that there are some people who believe that a person w a male body can be a woman & some people who don't. In a democratic society we can all get along courteously w people we don't share fundamental beliefs w & no one should not be discriminated for their beliefs.
-
-
Unless their beliefs are actively harmful against people, such as homophobia or transphobia or racism or sexism. You know. The thing this conversation is about?
-
In those cases, the beliefs must not be supported by the government and must be actively worked against. Because of the harm they cause.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But where there are practical conflicts between those beliefs they have to be worked out - e.g. in situations which involve bodily contact, nudity, vulnerability where single sex facilities are allowed.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.