We'll have to agree to disagree about that (re s28, not 29 my bad) until there are cases, but certainly EHRC withdrew its unequivocal statement suggesting having a GRC always entitles someone to access single sex services for opposite biological sexhttps://twitter.com/OnlyObjectivity/status/1049340702507913216?s=19 …
Just trying to understand what makes a bad apple..... Those girls were right to feel alarmed because of JYs age but not JY's sex? (In fact even noticing JY's sex makes them prejudiced?).
-
-
Neither the age or the sex is the issue? What's so hard to understand that anyone who seems obsessed with children's periods to the point where they'll even suggest helping those kids out tampons in - is fucking weird. Like, why is this not an easy concept to get?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
" but say a male person w gender ID woman demands that women who give massages only to women also attend to their naked body: u see as quite a different situation? Not a bad