doesn't matter. If your service says "women only", by UK law at least you're allowed to continue that service This doesn't matter in this situation, b/c by all legal counts Jess is a woman. So yes, if they refused her service because they believe she's a man, it's discriminationhttps://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1153777552915410946 …
-
"demands"? If you offer a service for women but refuse one woman because she's trans, or gay or black or whatever - how is this not textbook discrimination?
" but say a male person w gender ID woman demands that women who give massages only to women also attend to their naked body: u see as quite a different situation? Not a bad Yes that's pretty much the same argument Yaniv made in the tribunal "they offer Brazilian waxing (i.e. for women ), I'm a woman why should I be excluded just because I have a penis and testes"
-
-
Because they specifically offer waxes for vaginas. She doesn't have one, so she doesn't get service. If she had one, and they refused? She'd have every right to cry discrimination.
-
And although I'd support the fact it would be discrimination in that case. I wouldn't support Yaniv all the same. She's shown her self to be abusive, predatory and extremely creepy - on that basis alone - literally anyone can deny her services in intimate areas.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What is it that makes Yaniv a bad apple for making this argument, and not just someone who doesn't understand the technical differences involved in waxing different types of genitals?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.