[Tax] Oh @Oxfam. Oh @icij.... really?? really?? So Bob Geldof has a private equity company which invests in firms in Africa, and it structures through Mauritius (along with all the DFIs, IFC etcc) ...and....waves hands..."leak exposes multinationals siphoning tax revenues"https://twitter.com/oxfamwestafrica/status/1153602853631602688 …
-
-
IMO the crucial distinction is between using OFCs to reduce tax liabilities at source (e.g. Uganda) and using them as homes for intermediaries that do not themselves attract tax. Some of the commentary I've seen on this is mixing these up. Former is bad, latter is OK, IMO.
-
How about using them to reduce WHT on normal interest (cos putting an import tariff on the cost of borrowing is not such a good idea....). I know there are pros & cons to WHT administratively/economically & DTAs may be exploited for BEPS but not sure all source reduction is 'bad'
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I should re-read that, see if there's anything I would change now
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think more relevant is this World Bank paper https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/10/24/The-Cost-and-Benefits-of-Tax-Treaties-with-Investment-Hubs-Findings-from-Sub-Saharan-Africa-46264 … which estimates that African countries have lost 15-25% of their corporate tax revenues due to conduits, particularly Mauritius, with no evidence of increased investment flows
-
Yes that's a great paper but if you will forgive me I don't think my paper is less relevant. For example, my paper makes this relevant point:https://twitter.com/CarterPaddy/status/1153677326170972168?s=20 …
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Oxfam reaction >