JY says that SG wouldn't know. SG says they didn't have it back then. JY? How many wax clients? SG - 20 to 25 JY? How did you know if any were trans or not? SG - didn't know what trans was, hadn't met any trans people JY? How can SG tell if someone is gay?
-
Show this thread
-
Member says not relevant, need to wrap up. JY? You (SG) said if someone has a beard, does she thinks trans from that? SG - I didn't know what trans was JY? What would SG do if rejected because she was trans Member stops JY, says hearing about JY, not SG, says it isn't mediation
1 reply 5 retweets 112 likesShow this thread -
JY talks about emails, beard services, says SG not telling truth Member asks SG - JY never called you? JY never asked about flyer? Agree or disagree? Lawyer reminds Member about SG's language challenges - what did SB mean by calling?
1 reply 4 retweets 98 likesShow this thread -
Oops, what did SG mean by calling? SG - meant FB convos JY says a call is not FB. Says SG does not have "clean hands". SG says I am telling the truth. This is all about emails sent by SG to the Tribunal as part of process (with other people incorrectly included?).
3 replies 6 retweets 111 likesShow this thread -
Member says SG already answered that called meant FB convo. Then something about a beard or haircut, asks SG SG - was a mistake Member says explain SG - got a call JY would take me to Human Right so not sure what...JY interrupts, asks about email.
2 replies 5 retweets 100 likesShow this thread -
SG - thought it must be JY as JY was only person she talked to on FB JY says SG gave untrue info that has jeopardized the Tribunal, Lawyer objects. Member says it is an issue for her, not SG or JY.
3 replies 4 retweets 101 likesShow this thread -
Lawyer ask SG if she knew cases were being consolidated when she sent email. SG - others that were being sued? Lawyer says yes SG - didn't know Lawyer asks SG if she studied law SG - no Lawyer - studied BCHR code SG - no
2 replies 4 retweets 109 likesShow this thread -
JY starts to make an argument but is stopped by Member. SG's testimony is over. Talk re next hearing - probably no time for closing arguments so will schedule time, how much, how soon, arguments could be written not oral. Hearing is over!
15 replies 6 retweets 154 likesShow this thread -
Thanks for reading along, hopefully Canadian media will cover the last of these three consolidated cases. The remaining unheard cases could be dismissed if JY does not succeed with these, publication ban could be lifted or if JY succeeds, pretty sure we will be seeing appeals.
10 replies 30 retweets 308 likesShow this thread -
Regardless, important cases that will make law. I will be at both the next hearing and closing arguments. Talk to you then!
33 replies 15 retweets 386 likesShow this thread
Thank you so much for doing this. Shocking no media coverage (yet?). I hope you get to write it up in long form somewhere. And thanks for the Cabaret earworm 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.