Haven’t read this yet, what do you think? @MForstater, @dancingmaharani ,@JayneEEgertonhttps://twitter.com/5050oD/status/1143868247848247296 …
-
Article does the usual thing of presenting the idea that there might be any problem with losing human rights protections based on sex as being " a fear that women will break out of their “traditional roles” as mothers and caretakers, and seek education or employment instead"
This from the letter from the 150+ NGOs! 
Really guys? You think the definition of sexes is opaque? And thats the reason for lack of successful prosecutions? And so you want to replace it w something about deeply felt internal & individual experience imperceptible to others??pic.twitter.com/jCI0Ejbqt9
-
-
The special rapporteur doesn't seem to have thought it through at all
Basic argument seems to be hijras etc... should be protected, therefore lets pretend we can't define sex.pic.twitter.com/mpmTLdrpBP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.