In response to my complaint they say "RightsInfo is a small news organisation with limited resources, and is not able to cover all stories, with the editorial team taking decisions on a day-to-day basis"
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
As in, any "male" or "female" facility includes trans people in their preferred gender unless there is an explicit declaration otherwise posted.
How would this apply in situations of sex segregation due to bodily privacy (e.g. Under Schedule 3, s27 6b) "The circumstances are such that a person of one sex might reasonably object to presence of a person of the opposite sex"? This says nothing about preferred gender
-
-
s28 (not the historical one. though the coincidence is fun) has to be invoked to exclude any trans people, and I would add a requirement to state this explicitly and publicly.
-
No it doesn't. S 26 & 27 allow services to be provided to persons of *one sex*. This will also exclude people who happen to have other protected characteristics in addition to sex, but they are not being excluded because of those *other* protected characteristics.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 8 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.