You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I think @rights_info 's coverage of the question of how proposals for gender self ID will impact on women's rights has been woefully inadequate and skewed. When I raised this with founder and chair @AdamWagner1 he told me to make an official complaint
So I did, complaining about their coverage of a peaceful protest by gender critical women, in support of Linda Bellos and Venice Allen https://rightsinfo.org/linda-bellos-faces-trial/ …https://rightsinfo.org/how-media-missed-bigger-picture-trans-non-binary-rights/ …
Rights Info describe it as “A Highly Charged Atmosphere” "Intimidation". The person who brought the case against Linda & Venice was "Terrified of turning up at court….from the point of view of my personal safety.” “They have made me frightened and they have made me scared”
Rights Info replied "The Collins dictionary definition of ”highly charged” is “a situation [which] is extremely tense and emotional, and likely to make people have very strong reactions”. Many protests fit within this definition and this particular protest grew to 100 people.
"In this regard, the description by our journalist using the adjective “highly charged” was a reasonable description based on their experience of the protest"
They also defended reporting that “the conversations around the GRA consultation had gone too far” using language like “an outpouring of hatred” “blinded by the anger surrounding the GRA debate” ,“hysterical and heightened”
Here are some thing they haven't reported on: What happens when women have tried to meet to talk about the issue: graffiti and bomb threatspic.twitter.com/4qtHnaCIzk
Masked picketers, activists getting venues to cancel, and trying to block people getting in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=748BkGTmGf8 …pic.twitter.com/px8YTwcdX2
And physical attacks. This is what Rights Info has had to say about all of this: "the assault of a radical feminist at a rally in London’s Hyde Park" ... that's it. 13 words. No protagonist. No adjectivespic.twitter.com/9Q31tlE788
This is what Rights Info had to say about the recent assault on Julie Bindel after speaking at an event on women's rights in Edinburgh https://www.scotsman.com/news/crime/feminist-speaker-julie-bindel-attacked-by-transgender-person-at-edinburgh-university-after-talk-1-4942260 …pic.twitter.com/rAbINdOiy9
Here is what Rights Info have had to say about women losing their jobs, and academics being silenced, and women being kicked off social media for wanting to talk clearly about sex and gender.pic.twitter.com/bw3vl7KNaC
Here is how Rights Info have responded to gender critical legal experts offering to provide analysis of their concerns. https://twitter.com/RadFemLawyer/status/1119243812260466689 …pic.twitter.com/HWydMMiJ5j
And this is how they have responded to women asking them to at least state that sex"is a protected characteristic in law instead of inaccurately replacing it with "gender" https://twitter.com/2010Equality/status/1098254604582699008 …pic.twitter.com/0OfKvsxWh6
In response to my complaint they say "RightsInfo is a small news organisation with limited resources, and is not able to cover all stories, with the editorial team taking decisions on a day-to-day basis"
So what they are saying is there has been no systematic decision not to cover this stuff.... it was just something that slipped through the cracks 
This response came from the "Rights Info team". But Rights info is a charity. Its objects are to promote human rights (which include women's rights based on sex). This is the responsibility of the board. The complaints process was a dead end @AdamWagner1.pic.twitter.com/rl7ZcReNDy
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
