You'll have to explain where your mandate to speak for all women comes from.
-
-
You just asked for a single voice then set the bar impossibly high there.
1 reply 1 retweet 105 likes -
No, I just made, again, the point that women don't speak with a single voice.
17 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham @robblundell and
So what are you going to do, only listen to the ones you agree with?
1 reply 0 retweets 69 likes -
Replying to @treasa @robblundell and
If you had read my replies you wouldn't have suggested I do. You really should withdraw that suggestion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham @robblundell and
I read the thread. It left me with that impression. A number women voiced dissatisfaction. You told one of them you'd trust NatLottery funding decisions more. Not sure that you are listening to all women here.
1 reply 2 retweets 75 likes -
Replying to @treasa @JolyonMaugham and
You may want to consider what message you want to get through to people here. Because the one I am getting is that unless all women come with a single voice, you are not hearing.
1 reply 1 retweet 57 likes -
Replying to @treasa @robblundell and
The message you should have got, the only message you could have properly got, is that I do listen to women but that women don't speak with one voice.
9 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham @treasa and
Jolyon could you let me know if I'm muted, or if not why you havent responded to anything I've said? (logic problems ...how do I interpret a non response? Guess =I'm muted, because no would be so rude to ignore this Q when they want to demonstrate they listen to women, surely? )
2 replies 1 retweet 29 likes -
Thanks Dr 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.