A personal experience which illuminates the point on thinking about harms re: #opendata on #beneficialownership & company directorship.... I was reading a letter to the editor on a controversial topic from a woman with a generic name and no address given. I wondered who she was.
Of course it wasn't beneficial ownership information I looked at it was company directorship, which has been in the public domain since forever in the UK. But the internet & the open data approach of the companies house register makes it highly searchable
-
-
I don't know what the right answer on privacy/openness is, but things I do know (1) for directorship/BO data to be useful it must identify individuals (2) there are small harms to many individuals if this data is open (3) these harms are not addressed by exemptions.
Show this thread -
The benefit must justify the harm. What we should not do is try to fudge it by pretending (1) personal identity is not interoperably revealed (2) there are no harms to individuals from having this info in public domain (3) any harms that there are can be addressed by exemptions
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.