Maya Forstater

We have asked you more than a month ago to consider this debate. And you have been ignoring us. So I do not think you have not thought it through. You are refusing to think it through. Because you know the starting position, that a penis is female if a male says so, is absurd.

Hi Alessandra. I don’t want to minimise the seriousness of the issue, or your experiences. Il trying to figure out what the answer is, and the best way I have of doing that is to see what the law is, and says, the effect it has.

You have every right to be annoyed with me, if you feel I’m fence sitting, or misunderstanding the issue, or failing to empathise. If you want me to come out strongly on one ‘side’ then I’m afraid you are going to continue to be annoyed, and disappointed.

As for @rights_info, as I’ve said before, please take up issues with content with them, I don’t write or decide on content, I chair the board.

The organisation that you are responsible does not respond when people raise this issue https://twitter.com/2010Equality/status/1098514076194521088 …. It did not commission any gender critical expert views either during or since the GRA consultation, and has argued that these are not 'voices that matter'

This seems like a question for the board. Does the board stand by management's decision to no platform gender critical expert views? Telling people to take it up with a CEO who says its ok to call women who disagree with his position by an abusive slur is wholly inadequate.

Quite. The sex-based rights and protections of women are under unprecedented threat. Being neutral is not an option.