You have every right to be annoyed with me, if you feel I’m fence sitting, or misunderstanding the issue, or failing to empathise. If you want me to come out strongly on one ‘side’ then I’m afraid you are going to continue to be annoyed, and disappointed.
-
-
Replying to @AdamWagner1 @AlessandraAster and
As for
@rights_info, as I’ve said before, please take up issues with content with them, I don’t write or decide on content, I chair the board.3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AdamWagner1 @AlessandraAster and
Adam - you chair the Board of an organisation who's CEO endorses (and presumably holds) the view that 'Gender Critical' is a synonym for 'transphobe' and that 'TERF' is an acceptable way to describe those with gender critical views. https://www.change.org/p/greater-manchester-police-gmp-liam-did-nothing-wrong-do-not-discipline-him …pic.twitter.com/zVXI7bF5nu
5 replies 19 retweets 77 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @AdamWagner1 and
Maya Forstater Retweeted Equality Act 2010
The organisation that you are responsible does not respond when people raise this issue https://twitter.com/2010Equality/status/1098514076194521088 …. It did not commission any gender critical expert views either during or since the GRA consultation, and has argued that these are not 'voices that matter'
Maya Forstater added,
Equality Act 2010 @2010EqualityReplying to @AdamWagner1 @rights_infoThank you. It has been raised before ... https://twitter.com/AbsMcFabs/status/1085901898656317441 … https://twitter.com/lecanardnoir/status/1086991883870617601 … https://twitter.com/BubsandJacks/status/1085841808951832576 … https://twitter.com/AlessandraAster/status/1096760790617604096 … https://twitter.com/2010Equality/status/1087997991871500289 … https://twitter.com/HairyLeggdHarpy/status/1087009442158313474 … https://twitter.com/JoDrant/status/1092165012674744322 … https://twitter.com/PocketHanky/status/1085849371650867200 … https://twitter.com/SuffolkLCAudrey/status/1085539327147499520 … https://twitter.com/A_E_Jones/status/1055537994982195200 … pic.twitter.com/CCqNVIy6o16 replies 14 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @AlessandraAster and
Thanks Maya. I will raise this with the team.
4 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
-
Replying to @JoDrant @AdamWagner1 and
Adam. Try this thought experiment with another vulnerable group with a protected characteristic whose concerns have been systematically ignored, no platformed and referred to in insulting terms by your org...
4 replies 4 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @JoDrant and
...would "I'll raise this with the team" be an adequate response the first time it's raised to you, second? third? At what point should those people lose faith?
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @JoDrant and
I understand and will raise it. I do ask though that if you have specific complaints about content that you (and anyone else on this thread) raise them via the complaints policy. This is more direct than raising them with me on Twitter.https://rightsinfo.org/complaints-policy-of-rightsinfo/ …
8 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @AdamWagner1 @JoDrant and
I don't think it's so much an issue of IMPRESS journalistic standards on what is published. it's a governance Q about what/ who wasn't published by a charity whose purpose is to promote human rightspic.twitter.com/65yOrxH7wq
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes
The Q is did the board make a policy decision for the org to no platform gender critical legal experts, or did it just allow it to happen over an extended period (and ultimately is there a difference?)
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @AdamWagner1 and
One of the Q. Another is: is the charity upholding the existing law?
0 replies 2 retweets 5 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.