Given there are three ponds, including a mixed one I would regard the womens and mens ponds as having same sex exemptions (to allow those who would only swim with their own sex to do so)
-
(NB: my case is about belief discrimination, https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/lost-job-speaking-out/ …... I think it is about what the law says about belief as a protected characteristic, as well as sex and gender reassignment PCs)
Yes the law says if you go through the GRC process you are legally the opposite sex - but not for every purpose (for example peerages and inheritance! ). And para 28 schedule 3 allows for exclusion based on gender reassignment, where this is proportionate.
-
-
Ah yes, peerages ... I was quoted in Tatler about that a while back!
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Other sections in the EqA also allow exclusion based on gender reassignment -- e.g. in sports and communal accommodation. The aim of the GRA to enable trans people respect for privacy and family life , & the right to marry, not to undress with strangers of the opposite sex!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maya, your explanations here are excellent
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.