Thanks - do you have the policy for the pool?
-
The single sex ponds are places where men & women don't expect to be exposed while in a state of undress/half dressed to people of the opposite sex, and therefore to keep that expectation, excluding people of the opposite sex is proportionate, especially since there are 3 pondspic.twitter.com/xZyg8NULpK
Some people believe that a person with a penis can be a woman, some (a majority) don't. Neither group should be discriminated against in everyday life. But in situations involving taking your clothes off with strangers, integration of the two groups is not possible.pic.twitter.com/klAZCYuQX8
-
-
But this isn't about belief surely, it is about what the law says. And since the GRA 2004 someone with a penis *is* a woman if they go through the GRC procedure successfully.
-
(NB: my case is about belief discrimination, https://www.crowdjustice.com/case/lost-job-speaking-out/ …... I think it is about what the law says about belief as a protected characteristic, as well as sex and gender reassignment PCs)
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
So one or other group will be indirectly discriminated against by either allowing or excluding male bodied people into female intimate spaces (& vice versa). Where there is a mixed/unisex option it is proportionate to maintain single sex spaces, since no one is excluded overall.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.