What happened when I asked why my name was not included when my work was cited and criticised by @nickshaxson @TaxJusticeNet, pointing that CGD does not take organisational positions? They "corrected" this by removing the mention of the org.
https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1128964862091169793 …
-
-
And then it carries on.... https://twitter.com/nickshaxson/status/1131501227412467712 … It probably goes without saying but the normal, grown up thing to do is to cite a person's work who you are disagreeing with and then deal with the arguments in good faith.
Show this thread -
I really don't care if they cite my name or not or if they treat it like Voldemort for some reason. But it bugs me that people will assume that the arguments on this issue have been properly considered 'on the right side of history'.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would have also been worth correcting the error re Margaret Hodge "evidence"? Or a few more explanations on statistical methods.
-
You are optimistic Iain!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Infuriating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.