Ruth Hunt says she finds the “intellectual stupidity” of the gender debate alarming, but then gives no argument to support Stonewall's position that fully anatomically male people *are* women. Most people reading will assume she means post-op and @NosheenIqbal does not clarifyhttps://twitter.com/NosheenIqbal/status/1130007785066909697 …
-
-
'No debate' has always been an essential tool. In any such debate, a shared set of empirically unassailable truths would have to be agreed in order to communicate at all. Unfortunately those truths are fatal to one side of the debate, right at the start.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I also don't think we should forget characters from the past who raised a huge amount of money for charity - it was felt that their heart was in the right place. But they had a shadow side, which involved exploiting their position to abuse others.
-
Jimmy Savile
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. The parallels with Bantmangelidjh are really clear. I find it fascinating how such shallow posturing is accepted as good work.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.