Show this thread
-
In the name of feminism, they say we no longer need a word to describe the material state of being a female person. Biological sex "bears no relation to patterns of gendered oppression, experienced by all women" https://www.taxjustice.net/2019/03/27/joint-statement-of-trans-solidarity-in-feminist-tax-justice-advocacy/ …
Show this thread
You are giving away too much.https://hiyamaya.net/2019/03/27/dear-feminists-of-the-tax-justice-network/ …
-
-
Nemo dat quod non habet. It is not for males to give away womanhood. It is not theirs to give away in the first place.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure you must have seen this as well. Empirical evidence of the mechanisms by which the group of individuals with ova gets worse outcomes in the labour markethttps://twitter.com/LipstickEcon/status/1128627521505955841?s=20 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hear hear!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Feels like watching an intelligent person endeavouring to explain why water is wet. I admire your clarity, but the fact that we're being forced to have this discussion is utterly surreal. Their strategy is clear: Dismantle language
subvert meaning destroy idea disempowerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is the word men still used to describe those who impregnate people?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.